what is the best linux terminal? I have been using alacritty for years and have been doing well. But I don’t think kitty and st. I was wondering if any new projects have come out in recent years.

  • aordogvan@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    5 days ago

    Surprised nobody mentioned Yakuake. Just discovered it’s just for kde. Been using it for years. It hides at the top of my screen and slides down when the cursor hits the top. Full desktop when not used and can access it no matter which app I’m using.

  • todotoro@midwest.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 days ago

    Not a new project, but I feel is often overlooked: Sakura. I’ve fallen back to it repeatedly over the years. It is lightweight, opinionated but sane. Not as brutalist as st. I combo it with Tmux using powerline with little tweaking.

    It uses standard libraries and stays out of the way.

  • TruePe4rl@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 days ago

    I consider st a great choice when using i3 or dwm. Customizing it takes time, but RAM usage is what I usually check and in case of st it is comically small.

  • snekmuffin@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 days ago

    all of the fancy features that other terminals provide, I get with Tmux, so any emulator for me. I like transparent themes and that’s easy to set up in Alacritty, so that’s what I usually get

  • okamiueru@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 days ago

    Alacritty is fine. If you’re not combining it with tmux and zsh/fish, id pluck those fruits first.

    • Sbauer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Using ptyxis even on KDE, it’s neat. Very clean and some interesting integration with distrobox, definitely recommend.

  • Bobby Turkalino@lemmy.yachts
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Am I the only one that’s fine with whatever the OS provides out of the box? Like, as long as I can turn the bell off and change the font, I’m chillin, and I have yet to run into a terminal that doesn’t provide those options.

    Curious to hear what drives people to seek out other options (besides tiling, that I understand, I’m a tabs guy myself tho)

    • hjjanger@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Online trends I saw on the internet was the reason I hopped around multiple terminals. Use case for me it made no difference.

      There’s 4 other terminals I did enjoy using but xterm became my go to after I got tired of hopping around.

    • BoxEbony@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      7 days ago

      In my case it’s resource consumption, efficiency the impact with the windows manager I use, how much is keyboard controllable. It seems strange to me that a linux user uses the default applications. The beauty of linux is the huge variety and the ability to customize. If you use allova ready-made things, a mac or windows is fine too

      • Quintus@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        I don’t know I never felt the need to customize the terminal. I just like what it comes with. It feels wrong to change that. Black background and colored text is fine. The rest of the OS though damn it’s like a fucking birthday party! Nothing’s at default ffs

        • BoxEbony@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          edit-2
          7 days ago

          In the past I have found myself working with laptops with few resources and small screen (eeepc). Every pixel gained was a big win, and finding equivalent lightweight, high-performance applications could make all the difference. Eventually I found the optimal solution with i3 as windows manager and alacritty was the best terminal to use together (and zsh). Since then even though I have no real need I have continued to use this approach. And in the end being careful about pc resource consumption is also an ethical choice, if the pc consumes less power it is a gain for the environment.

  • h0bbl3s@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    https://gitlab.gnome.org/chergert/ptyxis

    Ptyxis is my current go-to. It can detect available pods or toolboxes (maybe docker too haven’t tested it) and you can open terminals directly into them. It also highlights ssh terms and root shells differently.

    There are a huge number of built-in color schemes as well and I’ve had no trouble finding any configuration option I’ve found myself wanting to look for.

    It’s also available on flathub so it’s easily installed in most distros.

          • snaggen@programming.dev
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            6 days ago

            Well, that was something… I have used ligatures in my code editor for quite a few years now, and I have NEVER been confused about the ambiguity this person is so upset about. Why? I have never ever seen the Unicode character for not equals in a code block, simply since it is not a valid character in any known language. In fact, I have never even seen it in a String where it actually would be legal, probably since nobody knows how to type that using a standard keyboard. This whole article felt like someone with a severe diagnose have locked in on some hypothetical correctness issue, that simply isn’t a problem in the real world.

            But, if you for some reason find ligatures confusing, then you shouldn’t use them. But, just to be clear, there is not a right of wrong like this blog post tries to argue, it is a matter of personal taste.

            • apostrofail@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              0
              ·
              6 days ago

              https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/ALGOL_68

              ALGOL 68, mother of all the C-likes, has ≠. There ace quite a few languages support Unicode such as ≠. What is not equals then? Exclamation mark + equals? Forward slash + equals? Tilde + equals? Less than + greater than? Equals + forward slash + equals. What is more clear than all of those aforementioned options from ‘modern programming languages’? 2260 ≠ Not Equal To. Type what you mean, specifically. Your programming language doesn’t support it? Your language is hurting clarity.

              • snaggen@programming.dev
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                6 days ago

                Good to know that every time I feel the need to use ALGOL 68, I must remember to disable ligatures. Still not sure this is going to be a huge problem 😂